152 S.E.2d 379
23761.Supreme Court of Georgia.SUBMITTED OCTOBER 12, 1966.
DECIDED NOVEMBER 23, 1966.
NICHOLS, Justice.
1. Where as in the case sub judice the evidence is conflicting as to all material issues in the case, the trial judge’s discretion in granting the husband a divorce, giving him custody of the child and denying alimony to the mother, will not be controlled.
2. We need not determine whether the trial judge erred in dismissing a certain individual as a party to the case. This is true since the sole question involving that party was whether he was holding property which was in actuality the husband’s so as to be subject to the wife’s claim for alimony and here the wife was not awarded alimony. Hence, this specification of error is moot.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
SUBMITTED OCTOBER 12, 1966 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 23, 1966.
Divorce. Richmond Superior Court. Before Judge Hardin.
Kravitch Hendrix, John W. Hendrix, Aaron Kravitch, for appellant.
Nicholson Fleming, William M. Fleming, Jr., Bell Bell, John C. Bell, for appellee.
Page 770
834 S.E.2d 96 (2019)306 Ga. 856 McCLURE v. The STATE. S18G1599.Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided:…
634 S.E.2d 520 CRENSHAW v. THE STATE. No. A06A0985.Court of Appeals of Georgia. DECIDED JULY…
316 S.E.2d 493 SHEFFIELD v. ZILIS et al. 66877.Court of Appeals of Georgia. DECIDED FEBRUARY…
67 S.E.2d 145 BARNES v. CHEEK. 33515.Court of Appeals of Georgia. DECIDED OCTOBER 4, 1951.…
7 S.E.2d 583 EWING et al. v. MECHANICS LOAN AND SAVINGS COMPANY; and vice versa.…
157 S.E.2d 758 R. H. MACEY COMPANY, INC. v. CHANCEY. 42712.Court of Appeals of Georgia.ARGUED…