443 S.E.2d 836
S94A0730.Supreme Court of Georgia.
DECIDED MAY 31, 1994. RECONSIDERATION DENIED JUNE 24, 1994.
HUNSTEIN, Justice.
Appellant was convicted of malice murder and theft by taking.[1] His trial counsel filed a timely motion for new trial, alleging, inter alia, that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. However, prior to any disposition by the trial court, new counsel withdrew the motion and filed a notice of appeal pursuant to a consent order entered by the trial court. In his sole enumeration of error on appeal appellant contends for the first time that his trial counsel was ineffective.
It is axiomatic that a claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel must be asserted at “the earliest practicable moment.”Smith v. State, 255 Ga. 654, 656 (3) (341 S.E.2d 5) (1986). In the present case, appellant through his new counsel had the opportunity to raise a claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel prior to this appeal in an amendment to the motion for new trial, but failed to do so. As such, his challenge to the effectiveness of his trial counsel is procedurally barred, and no remand is required. Owens v. State, 263 Ga. 99 (3) (428 S.E.2d 793) (1993).
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
DECIDED MAY 31, 1994 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED JUNE 24, 1994.
Murder. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Staley.
Frederick M. Scherma, for appellant.
Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Paige M. Reese, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Page 301