BURTON v. STYNCHCOMBE, 232 Ga. 510 (1974)

207 S.E.2d 493

BURTON v. STYNCHCOMBE.

28978.Supreme Court of Georgia.SUBMITTED JUNE 21, 1974.
DECIDED JULY 9, 1974.

UNDERCOFLER, Justice.

The Governor of Michigan sought the extradition of James William Burton for trial in that state for the offenses of fraudulent detention or use by a subcontractor of building contract funds and fraud by false pretenses. Burton filed a writ of habeas corpus in the Fulton County Superior Court and contended that the extradition proceeding was an endeavor to use the criminal process for the collection of civil debts. The trial court found that there was no merit in the habeas corpus application. The appeal is from that judgment. Held:

“The courts of the asylum state can not, upon a writ of habeas corpus, inquire into the guilt or innocence of the accused. No such jurisdiction is given them by law; and it would be a manifestly unwise provision if authority to investigate such a question were conferred on a tribunal that had no power to compel the attendance of witnesses who resided in another state, and whose testimony would be necessary to throw light on the issue. Upon the hearing of the present case, petitioner introduced evidence for the purpose of showing that the prosecution was not in good faith, but was instituted for the purpose of collecting a debt. This evidence could only be insisted on as a circumstance throwing light upon the guilt or innocence of the prisoner. We think, therefore, it was clearly inadmissible, and that the judge erred in undertaking to inquire into the motive and purpose of this prosecution.” Barranger v. Baum, 103 Ga. 465, 473
(30 S.E. 524).

It follows that the trial court properly denied the application for the writ of habeas corpus.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED JUNE 21, 1974 — DECIDED JULY 9, 1974.
Habeas corpus. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Tidwell.

King, Thurman Bonner, Marjorie C. Thurman, for

Page 511

appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, H. Allen Moye, for appellees.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

McCLURE v. STATE, 834 S.E.2d 96 (2019)

834 S.E.2d 96 (2019)306 Ga. 856 McCLURE v. The STATE. S18G1599.Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided:…

3 years ago

CRENSHAW v. STATE, 280 Ga. App. 568 (2006)

634 S.E.2d 520 CRENSHAW v. THE STATE. No. A06A0985.Court of Appeals of Georgia. DECIDED JULY…

8 years ago

SHEFFIELD v. ZILIS, 170 Ga. App. 62 (1984)

316 S.E.2d 493 SHEFFIELD v. ZILIS et al. 66877.Court of Appeals of Georgia. DECIDED FEBRUARY…

8 years ago

BARNES v. CHEEK, 84 Ga. App. 653 (1951)

67 S.E.2d 145 BARNES v. CHEEK. 33515.Court of Appeals of Georgia. DECIDED OCTOBER 4, 1951.…

8 years ago

EWING v. MECHANICS LOAN SAVINGS CO., 61 Ga. App. 808 (1940)

7 S.E.2d 583 EWING et al. v. MECHANICS LOAN AND SAVINGS COMPANY; and vice versa.…

8 years ago

R. H. MACEY COMPANY, INC. v. CHANCEY, 116 Ga. App. 511 (1967)

157 S.E.2d 758 R. H. MACEY COMPANY, INC. v. CHANCEY. 42712.Court of Appeals of Georgia.ARGUED…

8 years ago