HABERSHAM OAKS v. STORY, 281 Ga. App. 511 (2006)

637 S.E.2d 213

HABERSHAM OAKS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al. v. STORY. PELHAM PROPERTIES, INC. et al. v. STORY. WORKING SOLUTIONS, INC. et al. v. STORY.

Nos. A06A1507, A06A1508, A06A1509.Court of Appeals of Georgia.
DECIDED SEPTEMBER 11, 2006.

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

These cases arise out of the sale of a condominium unit which developed a moisture and mold problem as a result of an alleged improper installation and/or maintenance of synthetic stucco. We granted the applications for interlocutory appeal to review the trial court’s denials of summary judgment to Habersham Oaks Associates Limited Partnership, Pelham Properties, Inc., Pelham Construction, Inc., and Working Solutions, Inc.

All the parties agree, and it is clear from the record, that Pelham Properties is not a proper party to this lawsuit. Story acknowledges this fact. Therefore, the trial court erred in failing to grant summary judgment to Pelham Properties, and we reverse the trial court’s order as to that entity in Case No. A06A1508.

However, following plenary consideration of the cases, including a thorough review of the complete record on appeal, we have determined that the applications for interlocutory appeal from the remaining parties were improvidently granted. The orders granting the applications are therefore vacated and the appeals are accordingly dismissed.

Judgment as to Pelham Properties reversed in Case No. A06A1508. Case No. A06A1508, as to Pelham Construction, and Case Nos.

Page 512

A06A1507 and A06A1509 are hereby dismissed as improvidently granted. Miller and Ellington, JJ., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 11, 2006.
Real estate sale. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Moulton, Senior Judge.

Devlin Robinson, Marvin A. Devlin, Mark E. Robinson, Shuli L. Green, for Habersham Oaks Associates Limited Partnership et al.

Pursley, Lowery Meeks, John C. Amabile, for Pelham Properties, Inc. et al.

Mabry McClelland, Robert M. Darroch, Sarah E. Tollison, for Working Solutions, Inc. et al.

Brown Shamp, Robert H. Brown III, for Story.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

McCLURE v. STATE, 834 S.E.2d 96 (2019)

834 S.E.2d 96 (2019)306 Ga. 856 McCLURE v. The STATE. S18G1599.Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided:…

3 years ago

CRENSHAW v. STATE, 280 Ga. App. 568 (2006)

634 S.E.2d 520 CRENSHAW v. THE STATE. No. A06A0985.Court of Appeals of Georgia. DECIDED JULY…

8 years ago

SHEFFIELD v. ZILIS, 170 Ga. App. 62 (1984)

316 S.E.2d 493 SHEFFIELD v. ZILIS et al. 66877.Court of Appeals of Georgia. DECIDED FEBRUARY…

8 years ago

BARNES v. CHEEK, 84 Ga. App. 653 (1951)

67 S.E.2d 145 BARNES v. CHEEK. 33515.Court of Appeals of Georgia. DECIDED OCTOBER 4, 1951.…

8 years ago

EWING v. MECHANICS LOAN SAVINGS CO., 61 Ga. App. 808 (1940)

7 S.E.2d 583 EWING et al. v. MECHANICS LOAN AND SAVINGS COMPANY; and vice versa.…

8 years ago

R. H. MACEY COMPANY, INC. v. CHANCEY, 116 Ga. App. 511 (1967)

157 S.E.2d 758 R. H. MACEY COMPANY, INC. v. CHANCEY. 42712.Court of Appeals of Georgia.ARGUED…

8 years ago