246 S.E.2d 740
55915.Court of Appeals of Georgia.SUBMITTED JUNE 5, 1978.
DECIDED JULY 3, 1978.
BANKE, Judge.
The defendant appeals his conviction for armed robbery Held:
1. The victim’s eyewitness identification of the defendant amply supported the verdict.
2. The testimony that the victim chose the defendant’s photograph from a book containing numerous “mug shots” did not constitute inadmissible evidence of prior offenses. See Atcheson v. State, 136 Ga. App. 152 (2) (220 S.E.2d 483) (1975) and cits.
3. The contention that the pre-trial identification procedures were unnecessarily suggestive was not raised in the trial court and may not now be raised on appeal. See e.g., Martin v. State, 141 Ga. App. 181 (233 S.E.2d 38) (1977).
Page 534
Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.
SUBMITTED JUNE 5, 1978 — DECIDED JULY 3, 1978.
Armed robbery. Richmond Superior Court. Before Judge Fleming.
Saul, Blount Martin, Percy J. Blount, for appellant.
Richard E. Allen, District Attorney, Stephen E. Curry, Steven L. Beard, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.