MORTON v. STATE, 210 Ga. App. 868 (1993)

437 S.E.2d 839

MORTON v. THE STATE.

A93A2506.Court of Appeals of Georgia.
DECIDED NOVEMBER 5, 1993. RECONSIDERATION DENIED NOVEMBER 12, 1993.

JOHNSON, Judge.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court.[1]
In the

Page 869

original appeal, Morton v. State, 206 Ga. App. 413
(425 S.E.2d 336) (1992), Albert W. Morton’s conviction was affirmed, but his sentence was vacated because, as the State conceded, it exceeded the range authorized by law for the offense. The case was remanded for resentencing only. On remand, the trial court imposed a sentence which is well within the range authorized by law for the offense.

In this reappearance of the case, Morton seeks to raise again the merits of his underlying conviction. These issues, having previously been decided against him, may not be raised and considered again.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Blackburn, J., concur.

[1] Morton’s “car collection” has prompted two other opinions rendered by this court, however. See Morton v. McCoy, 204 Ga. App. 595
(420 S.E.2d 40) (1992); Morton v. State, 193 Ga. App. 119
(387 S.E.2d 9) (1989).

DECIDED NOVEMBER 5, 1993 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED NOVEMBER 12, 1993 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Sentence. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Carnes.

Albert W. Morton, pro se.
Paul L. Howard, Jr., Solicitor, Phyllis M. Burgess, Deborah W. Espy, Assistant Solicitors, for appellee.