335 S.E.2d 721

PATTERSON v. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY.

70320.Court of Appeals of Georgia.
DECIDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1985. REHEARING DENIED DECEMBER 4, 1985.

POPE, Judge.

Did the trial court commit reversible error granting appellee insurer’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that the pertinent portion of the application for insurance in this case (set forth in the Appendix to this opinion) substantially complied with the applicable provisions of the Georgia Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act (OCGA § 33-34-5) pertaining to applications prior to November 1, 1982? We find no error. Accor St. Paul Fire c. Ins. Co. v. Nixon, 252 Ga. 469 (314 S.E.2d 215) (1984); Chaney v. Ga. Mut. Ins. Co., 174 Ga. App. 734
(331 S.E.2d 78) (1985); Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Womack, 174 Ga. App. 140
(329 S.E.2d 282) (1985); Reed v. Ga. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 171 Ga. App. 126 (318 S.E.2d 746) (1984).[1] See also Appendix II Atlanta Cas. Co. v. Flewellen, 164 Ga. App. 885, 894
(300 S.E.2d 166) (1982).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Beasley, J., concur.

Page 239

[EDITORS’ NOTE: APPENDIX IS ELECTRONICALLY NON-TRANSFERRABLE.]
[1] See Appendices to Associated Indem. Corp. v. Sermons, 175 Ga. App. 513 (333 S.E.2d 902) (1985), for reproductions of the forms in these cases.

Page 240

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1985 — REHEARING DENIED DECEMBER 4, 1985 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Action on policy. Whitfield Superior Court. Before Judge Boyett.

R. Leslie Waycaster, Jr., for appellant.

Robert M. Darroch, for appellee.

Tagged: