694 S.E.2d 647

WATKINS v. ANEGUNDI et al.

No. S10A0153.Supreme Court of Georgia.
DECIDED MARCH 29, 2010. RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 3, 2010.

THOMPSON, Justice.

This case, in which plaintiff-appellant questions the constitutionality of OCGA § 51-1-29.5 on various grounds, is controlled adversely to plaintiff-appellant by Gliemmo v. Cousineau, 287 Ga. 7 (694 SE2d 75) (2010).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED MARCH 29, 2010. RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 3, 2010.
OCGA § 51-1-29.5; constitutional question. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Schwall.

Watkins, Lourie, Roll Chance, Lance D. Lourie, Robert D. Roll, Stephen R. Chance, Bondurant, Mixson Elmore, Michael B. Terry, Kamal Ghali, for appellant.

Huff, Powell Bailey, Daniel J. Huff, Randolph P. Powell, Jr., Erica S. Jansen, Insley Race, Kevin P. Race, Moses Kim, McClure, Ramsay, Dickerson Escoe, John A. Dickerson, Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones Sweeney, Roger E. Harris, Gretchen H. Wagner, Forrester Brim, Robert S. Lazenby, for appellees.

Page 134

Tagged: